|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd)
To be clear, I am being misquoted. I did not say, nor do I believe that XML should follow that rule. I believe parsers should be very strict. Otherwise it's all mishegas. Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robin Berjon" <robin@k...> To: "David Megginson" <david@m...> Cc: <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:33 AM Subject: Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd) > At 11:41 27/02/2001 -0500, David Megginson wrote: > >I agree with Dave Winer, however, that XML > >violates the primary Internet law of being conservative in what you > >produce but liberal in what you accept. > > I agree, but violates seems to imply that it's a bad thing. I think that > law has shown it's limit with the explosion of HTML. When addressing an > audience of people that large, generally unconcerned with compliance to > whatever so long as they can put something out there (and perhaps make some > money with it) the more liberal you are the more liberal people will expect > you to be. It quickly becomes a vicious circle, with the vicious > consequences we know. > > -- robin b. > "Chance is irrelevant. We will succeed." -- 7o9 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS > <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








