[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?

• From: Jonathan.Robie@S...
• To: francis@r...
• Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 10:44:09 -0400

Linda van den Brink wrote:

> What I'm interested in knowing, is how sure are we that the w3c (schema and
> other?) specs are not comprehensible enough, and that implementation
> experience and rapid acceptance are being affected. Is it just a
hunch we
> have? A general feeling among people on this list? What's the w3c's view on
> this?

One indicator is whether people are successfully writing implementations, implementations are compatible, and the implementors are not complaining (too much). This seems to carry a lot of weight in the W3C.

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
• Next by Date: Re: An issue?: Parsers with XML Schema support & reporting errorsininvalid documents
• Previous by thread: RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
• Next by thread: Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread