[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?

• From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@i...>
• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 16:44:02 +0200

This is funny, an hour ago I was thinking about the possibility,
to create a strictly conforming subset of XML Schema, with different
namespace so the only change required for transfer to XML Schema 
would be the change of it :)

But I like facets. It took me some time to realize what they do, but
then  I like the concept. But of course I would not call them facets,
the name is a bit scary :). 

Give me a few basic types and a few facets an I can move the earth
(well, validate 
and specify more efficiently). 



  So I
> expect
> that someone will create a version of XML schemas using a different
> namespace and the same names, but simplified down to an XDR/RELAX Core
> level: Key constraints removed, simple type derivation removed, facets
> removed, include/ignore/redefine removed, complex type derivation
> removed,
> xsi:null removed, form/block/final/abstract removed.
> 
> A schema in this language could be converted into an XML Schema by
> changing the namespace. Documentation and specs for it could be pretty
> simple and easy to express, both informally and formally.  Of course,
> we already have XDR, SOX, RELAX core etc, so perhaps we don't need
> another DTD-in-XML+simple-datatyping  schema language...but it would
> certainly be possible and, I think, attractive.  Such a language
> could even serve as a training wheels version for XML Schemas.
> 
> I don't expect W3C to do this. But there is nothing stopping some
> firebrand on
> this list coming up with it (the XSLT transformation to XML Schema
> namespace would surely be trivial).  Then you can just ignore all the
> bits of XML Schemas you don't like.  (Indeed, it is possible that
> you could use redefine to even maintain the same namespace, but I
> don't think that is fair use, and would only muddy the waters.)
> 
> Rick Jelliffe

-- 
******************************************
<firstName> Miloslav </firstName>    
<surname>   Nic      </surname>     

<mail>    nicmila@i...    </mail>   
<support> http://www.zvon.org  </support>
<zvonMailingList> 
    http://www.zvon.org/index.php?nav_id=4 
</zvonMailingList>

• References:
  • RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
    • From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink@b...>
  • Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
    • From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
• Next by Date: RE: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
• Previous by thread: Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
• Next by thread: Re: Improved writing -- who's going to pay for it?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread