[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: BizTalk: Overloading Semantics

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 08:27:57 -0500

dim e As enterprise;
set e = myCOM.squared

If you want to get viral, get viral.


Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Brennan [mailto:Michael_Brennan@A...]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 7:55 PM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE: BizTalk: Overloading Semantics


> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...]
> 
> A problem with BizTalk marketing is the 
> term business is used just as generically  
> as the term "document" is used in XML and 
> in conversation, with the same unfortunate 
> results.
>  [...]
> Anyone have a sexier description without 
> invoking images of money changing hosts?

Well, whatever term is used, it should be prefixed with a lowercase "e" to
be consistent with prevailing marketing standards.  ;-)


Michael Brennan
Allegis Corp.
"eBusiness for ePartners(tm)"    <--- (fully standards-compliant)

• Prev by Date: RE: GUI XML Editing tools
• Next by Date: Re: XML Schemas: ref'ing vs inlining
• Previous by thread: RE: BizTalk: Overloading Semantics
• Next by thread: Streaming XML back to IE browser problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread