• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, "xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:44:45 -0400

At 07:21 PM 7/31/00 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
>
>> Sure!  I also want DTDs back,
>
>The Core WG decided DTDs were out of scope, except for the notation and
>entity reports required by XML 1.0.

Like I said, it's very difficult to derail these W3C trains once they start
moving down the track...

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books

• References:
  • Re: Why the Infoset?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Why the Infoset?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Why the Infoset?
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Next by Date: RE: Are there still a lot of people using DTD rather than schema?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Next by thread: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread