• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,"xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:21:53 -0400

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:

> Sure!  I also want DTDs back,

The Core WG decided DTDs were out of scope, except for the notation and
entity reports required by XML 1.0.

> and everything else available from the
> original XML document.  Anything else lost?

See http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset#omitted , which does not mention
character references but should.

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why the Infoset?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Why the Infoset?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Why the Infoset?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Next by Date: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Previous by thread: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Next by thread: Re: Why the Infoset?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread