• From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@l...>
• To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 16:41:57 +0200

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> 
> > My main problem with RDF is that I cannot transform my UML
> > into "nice" RDFS since UML is object-oriented whereas RDF
> > is property-centric.
> >
> > And all my data is object-oriented, it just does not fit
> > very well into RDF. Can you show me an example of semantics
> > defined in RDFS+RDF that I can not express using UML+SOAP
> > serialization? SOAP serialization seems much simpler
> > and better readable than RDF.
> 
> I made a presentation at the WWW9 conference [1] on the subject of
> serializing RDF using SOAP [2] based on work by Andrew Layman, Gopal
> Kakivaya and others. Unfortunately I don't have a link for it.

OK, but how is this related to my question? How would that
help to serialize object oriented data as RDF? And 
why should I use RDF instead of SOAP serialization?

Best,

Stefan

• References:
  • RDF, SOAP and UML
    • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@l...>
  • Re: RDF, SOAP and UML
    • From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Public Identifiers
• Next by Date: Re: UNIX pipes, XML processing
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF, SOAP and UML
• Next by thread: Re: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread