• From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@l...>
• To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 17:37:02 +0200

Jonathan Borden wrote:
> 
> Yes, the RDF syntax/serialization
> format can be used to store the data from semantic modelling applications,
> but RDF is also and more generally used as a layer on top of XML in order to
> define semantics. 

My main problem with RDF is that I cannot transform my UML 
into "nice" RDFS since UML is object-oriented whereas RDF 
is property-centric.

And all my data is object-oriented, it just does not fit
very well into RDF. Can you show me an example of semantics 
defined in RDFS+RDF that I can not express using UML+SOAP
serialization? SOAP serialization seems much simpler
and better readable than RDF.

Best,

Stefan

-- 
Stefan Haustein             
Univ. Dortmund, FB 4, LS 8   tel: +49 231 755 2499
Baroper Str. 301             fax: +49 231 755 5105
D-44221 Dortmund (Germany)   www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDF, SOAP and UML
    • From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@m...>

• References:
  • Re: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@h...>
  • Re: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
    • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@l...>
  • Re: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: tool for merging two DOM trees?
• Next by Date: RE: Recommended Simple XML Tools
• Previous by thread: Re: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
• Next by thread: Re: RDF, SOAP and UML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread