• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@h...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 07:09:02 +0000 (CEST)

Jonathan Borden wrote:

>Ronald Bourret wrote:
> >
> > By the way, I would be really curious to see any applications for which
> > knowing of an attribute is "in" a namespace -- as opposed simply
> >identifying
> > the attribute -- is important. I can't think of any, but maybe I'm just
> > unimaginative.
>
>A counter example would be the use of attributes in shorthand RDF
>serializations.

Could you clarify that a bit? My knowledge of RDF is sketchy at best. (Does 
RDF assume that unprefixed attributes are RDF-specific rather than belonging 
to the shorthand elements?)

-- Ron
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XLink transformations
• Next by Date: Re: validating w/ schema vs. dtd
• Previous by thread: Re: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
• Next by thread: Re: Default Namespaces - why don't they apply to attributes?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread