• From: Anthony Channing <AnthonyC@1...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 12:25:06 +0100

Is the new moto of XML going to be...

"BE PURE, BE VIGILANT, BEHAVE"?

Anton (wondering if that makes Bill Gates
into Nemesis the Warlock)


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Sebastian Rahtz
> [SMTP:sebastian.rahtz@c...]
> Sent:	26 July 2000 11:46
> To:	joshuaa@m...
> Cc:	xml-dev@l...
> Subject:	RE: XML in .NET - more than just SOAP?
> 
> Joshua Allen writes:
>  > OK, I have looked more closely and Word's output is not entirely
>  > "well-formed".  On the other hand, it displays nicely in a 
>  > wide range of browsers. 
> ...
>  > So, while it is not perfect (and it will get better)
>  > it seems to me to be quite useful.  I call it XML,
>  > although a purist could nitpick some of the flaws.
> 
> 
> I have printed this out and stuck it on my wall with a note saying 
> "BE VIGILANT". What a wonderful example of how to abuse such a simple
> standard as XML.
> 
> Sebastian Rahtz

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML in .NET - more than just SOAP?
    • From: Richard Lanyon <rgl@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML in .NET - more than just SOAP?
• Next by Date: RE: XML in .NET - more than just SOAP?
• Previous by thread: RE: Word output as XML? (was RE: XML in .NET - more than just SOAP?)
• Next by thread: RE: XML in .NET - more than just SOAP?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread