[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XInclude [was: XLink transformations]

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@a...>, xml-dev@x...
• Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:35:32 -0500

Is the sense of a merge operation that information 
merged into another document loses its original 
identity such that reversing the operation is 
not guaranteed?

Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Grosso [mailto:pgrosso@a...]
 
XInclude is more like knitting together parse trees 
(or infosets) at (or immediately after) parse time 
well before any application gets a chance at the document.
XInclusion in the original source document would occur 
even before any XSLT transformation occurred and well
before any XLinking or styling occurred.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XInclude [was: XLink transformations]
    • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Can an element be sometimes empty?
• Next by Date: Re: SOAP serialization
• Previous by thread: Re: XInclude [was: XLink transformations]
• Next by thread: RE: XInclude [was: XLink transformations]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread