• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Gilles Marichal <gmaricha@A...>, "xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:06:28 -0400

Gilles Marichal wrote:

> Note the comment on rule 44:
> For interoperability, the empty-element tag must be used, and can only be
> used, for elements which are declared EMPTY.

According to the errata, the "must" in this sentence has been replaced by
"should"; "for interoperability" marks a recommendation, not a requirement.

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

• References:
  • Re: Can an element be sometimes empty?
    • From: Gilles Marichal <gmaricha@A...>

• Prev by Date: ask for visual XSL editor
• Next by Date: RE: XInclude [was: XLink transformations]
• Previous by thread: Re: Can an element be sometimes empty?
• Next by thread: RE: Can an element be sometimes empty?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread