[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition

• From: Bob Kline <bkline@r...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 12:31:16 -0400 (EDT)

Earlier today David Brownell wrote:

> (*) Sun's not the vendor to blame for those speed issues;
>     it's easy to implement a java.io.Reader class that
>     does the decodings with  very low overhead, but the folk
>     who did that subsysteim in JDK 1.1 didn't choose such
>     a natural approach.

Just to clarify, are you saying that Sun outsourced the implementation
of java.io.Reader?  To whom?  Or are you instead saying that it's
inappropriate to blame Sun even if they did the implementation
themselves, because it would be so easy to override the behavior of the
class?

-- 
Bob Kline


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: "David Brownell" <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by Date: RE: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Previous by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Next by thread: Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread