[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: need for defining standard APIs for xml storage

• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• To: "gopi" <gopi@a...>, <n.vinokurov@m...>
• Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:22:51 -0500

Hi Gopi,

Gopi said:
	No, No.  We can't go and change the already recommended DOM 1.0 spec.

Didier replies:
So, what about DOM3? maybe we can ask for such a useful function. I still do
not understand why the DOM people forgot it in the DOM2 specs??? Maybe their
case usage model is to be changed. DOM is not solely useful for scripts to
be executed in browsers. Or, maybe the DOM WG is now considering to add this
kind of function. Does it?

Cheers
Didier PH Martin
----------------------------------------------
Email: martind@n...
Conferences: Web Chicago(http://www.mfweb.com)
             XML Europe (http://www.gca.org)
Book: XML Professional (http://www.wrox.com)
column: Style Matters (http://www.xml.com)
Products: http://www.netfolder.com


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: need for defining standard APIs for xml storage
    • From: "Lauren Wood" <lauren@s...>
  • XPath and DOM (was RE: need for defining standard APIs for xml storage)
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>

• Prev by Date: 'Virtual' XML (RE: How far current XSLT processors will be useful in real applications?)
• Next by Date: RE: need for defining standard APIs for xml storage
• Previous by thread: RE: need for defining standard APIs for xml storage
• Next by thread: XPath and DOM (was RE: need for defining standard APIs for xml storage)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread