Re: Alternatives to the W3C
Simon St.Laurent writes: > As it is, we've got a closed standardization process that rarely focuses on > 'running software first'. to be fair, some of them are pretty open. I don't think you could claim that XSLT falls into the category of closed and unimplemented > Anyone got a good CSS2 implementation? maybe its because no-one wants CSS, they they don't take its implementation seriously? > XSL-FOs? foul! FO spec is unfinished. > (At least Amaya provides some real support for XHTML.) you cannot seriously suggest that Amaya is useful for anything other than the odd demonstration... sebastian xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format