Re: Alternatives to the W3C
Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > > > XSL-FOs? > foul! FO spec is unfinished. Actually, perhaps that means it's right on the mark. It's better to have code (such as FOP? ;-) implementing drafts, and turning up bugs therein, than to wait till any sort of "Candidate REC" stage to start such work. Admittedly, tracking a moving target is a hassle, but I've seen more good come out of such work than otherwise. Once organizations start to "freeze" a spec, willingness to fix it starts to go away, even in the face of substantial bugs that turn up. While the drawing board is still out, fixes can easily be applied. When it's closed up, that's not so any longer. - Dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format