[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: MODERATION [was: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives t

• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 08:39:27 -0500

Peter Murray-Rust wrote:

<snip/>
> This is a good time to remind people that they should NOT quote the list
> signature. Some time ago we discussed whether the signature was valuable -
> the recent removal and consequent increase in "unsubscribe"s showed that
it
> was. But one copy per posting - attached by the mailer - is all that is
> required!
>

Could I add for people to make sure that the list name not appear in both
the "to" and the "cc" fields?  There are quite a few messages like that, and
if you reply it might go to the wrong place, or get duplicated (I've done it
too).  There have been a lot of duplications, it seems.

Tom Passin


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message
unsubscribe xml-dev  (or)
unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address

Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • MODERATION [was: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)]
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrable language; reconsider?)
• Next by Date: how do you get off this list?
• Previous by thread: MODERATION [was: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)]
• Next by thread: RE: Alternatives to the W3C (was Re: Alternatives to the W3C)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread