Re: Clearer W3C Specs (was Re: XML Information Set is seeding impenetrab
Thanks, Henry and Tim, for responding to my post. I'm very happy to hear about this advance. Tom Passin Henry S. Thompson wrote: > "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@i...> writes: > > > <snip/> > > > > The IETF won't bless an RFC until there are two independent implementations. > > I think this is the right kind of approach. Surely, Tim B's Lark > > implementation must have been a great help to the XML committee (I'm > > guessing, I don't really know anything about its role). There's nothing > > like trying to build to a spec to uncover its lack of clarity. > > The W3C has recently introduced a status of Candidate Recommendation > which we expect most RECs to pass through, which is specifically > designed for implementation feedback. XML Schema is certainly > intending to take advantage of this. > xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message unsubscribe xml-dev (or) unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format