[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SGML, XML and SML

• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 03:02:24 +0800

 From: Don Park <donpark@d...> 

>>Well, it is not XML at all if  it miss-parses a well-formed XML
>>document.
>>
>><a>
>>    <?b </a> ?>
>>    <!-- </a> -->
>>    <![CDATA[ </a> ]]]>
>></a>
>
>Rick, I think you are actually picking an example favoring
>the use of SML.  It might be legal XML but it is also a
>bracketed ball of mess.  Besides, SML processors can't
>parse full XML just as XML parsers can parse full SGML.
 
No, every XML document is a legitimate WebSGML document.
But would every SML document be a well-formed XML document?

That example is one that SML would have to have a policy on:
one that would constrain documents to being XML is to barf
whenever <!  or <? was found.
    
If you want a less bracketed mess, then pick any one of
    <a><!-- <a/>  --></a>
or
    <a><!?x <a/>  ?></a>
or 
   <a><![CDATA[ <a/>  ]]></a>

Or even:
<p>In HTML, use the &lt;!-- comment delimiter open </p>


Rick Jelliffe


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What is a document?
• Next by Date: RE: Grafting DOM on a C++ XML parser?
• Previous by thread: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by thread: RE: SGML, XML and SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread