[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: SGML, XML and SML

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 11:50:02 -0800

>No, every XML document is a legitimate WebSGML document.
>But would every SML document be a well-formed XML document?

No.  SML has no concept of documents.  Every SML data is a
external parsed XML entity.

>If you want a less bracketed mess, then pick any one of
>    <a><!-- <a/>  --></a>
>or
>    <a><!?x <a/>  ?></a>
>or 
>   <a><![CDATA[ <a/>  ]]></a>
>
>Or even:
><p>In HTML, use the &lt;!-- comment delimiter open </p>

First three is failed by SML processor.  Last should pass.

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>

• References:
  • Re: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Grafting DOM on a C++ XML parser?
• Next by Date: RE: SGML, XML and SML
• Previous by thread: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by thread: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread