RE: Feeling good about SML
Rick Jelliffe wrote: > But why this endless "not invented here" desire to reinvent XML. It is > still a mystery too me. The complication in the XML world is not XML > 1.0, but namespaces Amen! > (which means that an element names may mean > different things in different contexts) and class-based schemas (which > can mean that even within a namespace a name may mean different things > depending on context). Anyone who thought DTDs were hard may be in for > a shock unless we are careful! Isn't that water already under the bridge? /Jelks xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format