[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Feeling good about SML

• From: Sean McGrath <digitome@i...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1999 11:12:11 +0000

[Rick Jelliffe]
>
>The reason SGML has so many optional features is because there were so
>many people who just *had to have* something to make their life simpler.
>Everytime someone says "I don't like PIs" or "I don't like DTDs" or "I
>don't like external entities" or "I don't like non-ASCII" it raises the
>largely bogus spectre of XML 1.1 or XML 2,0 or whatever.  It would be a
>sad day to see the SGML declaration reappear as XFM. I
>
Why would it be a sad day?

	1) XML parsers differ in important ways
	2) Knowing the differences is useful for XML developers

It seems to me to be a no-brainer to conclude:

	3) Having an agreed upon way to document the differences 
	for both human and software consumption is useful.

No?

regards,

<Sean uri="http://www.digitome.com/sean.html">
Developers Day co-Chair WWW9, April 2000, Amsterdam
<uri>http://www.www9.org</uri>
</Sean>



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Feeling good about SML
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Next by Date: Re: SGML, XML and SML
• Previous by thread: Re: Feeling good about SML
• Next by thread: RE: Feeling good about SML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread