[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why do we write standards?

• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 13:07:22 -0800

James Robertson wrote:
> 
> At 05:39 13/11/1999 , Steven R. Newcomb wrote:
> 
> >(I'm trying to think who defends XML from creeping scope.  I should
> >know the answer to that question, but I don't.)
> 
> After some of my (as usual) rabid posts attacking
> creeping featurism in XML, I have received a number
> of private responses encouraging me.
> 
> Let's just say that some of these hold respected
> positions in the standards process ... :-)
> 
> The question is: why everyone is keeping their
> heads down on this topic?

There's the "volume of traffic on XML-DEV" issue,
which can affect even just keeping up with traffic.

Also, agreeing with self-evident truths isn't
always an effective way to invest time ... :-)

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Why do we write standards?
    • From: Bill dehOra <Wdehora@c...>
  • Re: Why do we write standards?
    • From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)
• Next by Date: Re: Are you sure the XML decl shouldnt be a PI ? :)
• Previous by thread: Re: Why do we write standards?
• Next by thread: Baroque CSS (was: Why do we write standards?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread