[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)

• From: "Richard Anderson" <rja@a...>
• To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>,<xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 19:30:20 -0000

> The XML header could be a PI tag based on its delimiters, but it is not
> by definition. James Clark has picked me up on this a few times: he is
> so tough. The XML header is stripped as a function of entity management.

I agree.

> However, even though the encoding attribute in the XML header does not
> form part of the information set of  a document, I think it is a mistake
> to think that it should be discarded after the parsing of a document.

I agree 110%

> I hope that future APIs could keep this in mind: hide the encoding from
> the processor by all means, but save the encoding information for
> re-encoding later.

Yes.  I'd go further and say the processor should have the option to see the
encoding. For example, given 1 XML input stream I should be able to create 5
outputs, which each output in the same encoding as the original input if so
desired.

Regards,

Richard.
>
> Rick Jelliffe
>
>
>
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
> Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on
CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
> To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
> unsubscribe xml-dev
> To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following
message;
> subscribe xml-dev-digest
> List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)
    • From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@e...>

• References:
  • Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: HERE's why the world needs a simpler XML! [was Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)]
• Next by Date: Re: Why do we write standards?
• Previous by thread: Re: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)
• Next by thread: RE: The XML decl is not a PI (especially in SAX)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread