[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Parser compliance

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 17 Nov 1999 12:46:48 -0500

Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@c...> writes:

> Sean Mc Grath writes:

>  > Fully 1.0 Compliant - Non Validating
> ...
>  > 2. XT
>  > 
> XT is not an XML parser. It uses XP. 

My fault -- I initiated the typo, and Sean simply disseminated it.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Feeling good about SML
    • From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>
  • re: Parser compliance
    • From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>
  • re: Parser compliance
    • From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Do SGML and XML co-exist?
• Next by Date: Re: Parser compliance
• Previous by thread: re: Parser compliance
• Next by thread: Re: Parser compliance
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread