Re: Feeling good about SML
>At 11:54 AM 11/16/99 +0000, Sean Mc Grath wrote: >>I see this as nothing more than codifying existing >>practice. There are lots of parsers that claim >>to be XML parsers but when you look closely they >>don't do X,Y and Z per the specification. > [Tim Bray] >Is that really true? I believe it is true but I would be delighted to be wrong. Does anyone knowledgeable in the minutia of XML compliance care to list the extant parsers and put them into fully XML 1.0 compliant and non-XML 1.0 compliant camps? The next step would be to segregate the XML 1.0 compliant parsers along the lines of things they do that are "optional" per the spec. that cause interoperability problems. regards, <?xml version="1.0"?> <p> This document has three erors. /p> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format