RE: [SML] Data Markup Language?
> If we decide that SML is for data and not for publishing, should we then > rename SML to Data Markup Language (DML)? Data vs Publishing? How do you define the boundaries there? We're commonly taking SGML/XML markup of 'publishing' data (abstracts, titles, authors, etc) and using this data as XML messages ('data') between systems. So we seem to be lying on the boundaries here. > The real answer to this question depends on the audience that is interested in > SML, I think. So it would probably be sufficient to refute my suggestion by > having a large enough group of people express interest in SML for publishing. What is SML about anyway? What are the benefits beyond reductionism? Hard to be interested when you don't know what its for. Personally I'm waiting to see what APIs might be layered on top of SML, and then possibly retrofit them to an XML parser and then be on my way... L. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format