[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RDF, again

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "'xml-dev@i...'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: 25 Nov 1999 08:30:33 -0500

Paul Prescod <paul@p...> writes:

> But we haven't got around to marking it up. 

Do you mean XML or RDF in particular?  I was referring to XML, which
is coming along very well -- see
http://www.oasis-open.org/cover/xml.html#applications.
is that we stop worrying about the low-level lexical details of markup
and start worrying about higher-level issues like object exchange
(RDF, XMI, or what-have-you).

> The heavily minimized version of your example is easy to read in the
> traditional XML sense but it is very hard to puzzle out the RDF
> graph for it. The uniminized one is great for machine to machine but
> not at all appropriate for anything humans would work with.  Why do
> we have to choose?

Because that's the nature of information exchange.  Any
fully-normalized information is going to be hard to read, because
you're going to have to jump around following the links; any
fully-denormalized information is going to be hard to process.

I don't know if RDF should have tried to deal with both situations in
the same spec (probably not), but switching low-level syntax from tags
to parentheses is hardly going to affect the fundamental problem.
Machines and people eat information differently.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@b...>
  • Re: SGML, XML and SML
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • RDF, again
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: RDF, again
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: RDF, again
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: RDF, again
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Linking a XML document to its schema
• Next by Date: Re: XLink within a DTD ?
• Previous by thread: Re: RDF, again
• Next by thread: Re: Do SGML and XML co-exist?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread