David, >> I do not think it is superflous to allow ¤. > >Given that this is defined to be the same as $ at the lowest >level of xml >parsing, I can not see any reason why the arguments currently being >applied to get rid of attributes (which are nowhere nearly as closely >identified with the `equivalent' element markup) do not apply to this >case as well. Not allowing ¤ means: 1. SML parsers will have to check for it which complicates implementation. 2. SML spec will have to explain it which complicates the spec. For above two reasons, I do think ¤ should be allowed. Does this answer your question? Best, Don Park - mailto:donpark@d... Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format