RE: [SML] Without attrs, you don't need empty elements...
>All of a sudden, we're forgetting the *people* altogether and >trying to see how simple we can make the *parser* [snip] Reverand, By the tone of your message, I get the sense that you assume 'we' collectively forgot what 'we' said before and are inconsistent or diverted. This is not true. Just as you are interested in 'easy to learn' aspect of SML, each of us come to SML with different needs. I am interested in finding the right balance which could mean that no one will be completely satisfied nor deprieved. If current SML threads are far-off target as you say, it is because not everything can be discussed at once. Also, you should bring up the issue of "easy to learn" whenever it seems relevent in any of the threads. Best, Don Park - mailto:donpark@d... Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format