Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML: Still Just HypedWebStuff
 Len Bullard wrote: <snip> > Ask yourself why ANY good technical VP responsible for the > bottom line of his company implements a technology that > costs more to implement and maintain owing to the instability of the > platforms, has to be sold for less given the hyped perception of > ease and ubiquity, and in the end, gives moreorless the same > results as the relational system and CSV? > > Cost justify XML. This is interesting argument, but: 1) It is far from clear that XML solutions will have to be sold for less because of "hyped perception of ease and ubiquity". My experience is that people are willing to pay more for XML when the advantages are made clear to them (and it helps to have the press screaming from the rooftops about how this is the Next Big Thing). As far as commoditization is concerned: there is an interesting article in the Economist this week that disputes this claim (at http://www.economist.com/editorial/freeforall/current/index_fn2500.html). Their conclusions seem to be borne out in fact. People would rather shop at Amazon, where they know the interface, like the features and trust the vendor, than save $2 and shop at an anonymous vendor competing only on price. It's true that as XML becomes more prevalent the way people shop on the Web will change radically, but it is a safe bet that vendors will continue to find ways other than price to differentiate their offers. 2) Do you really think that XML gives the same results as an RDBMS and CSV? Just to give one example, if I have a PHP/ColdFusion/ASP/whatever site delivering HTML and I suddenly discover that I need to support WAP (or Ariba Network or PDF or...) I am forced to reimplement everything and then maintain my two (or three or four) versions in parallel. If I go for an XML-based solution, then much of my site logic can be drawn up out of the RDBMS into the XML layer, and the step to the various delivery formats is only a transformation away. Saving time means saving money, how's that for a cost justification? Nevertheless, there is a need for people to start implementing stuff and establishing a community where schemas, stylesheets and the like can be "discovered" rather than developed from scratch whenever needed. We also need more and better tools, especially on the authoring side. The investment in getting an XML-based solution up and running is relatively high, and even the subsequent leverage that this provides will pay back this investment relatively quickly. There's a real risk that out-of-the-box solutions will appear that provide only a portion of the potential added value of XML but are so easy to implement and deploy that they edge more powerful approaches out of the market. Something to be scared about. Matthew xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...) 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
