[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Feeling good about SML

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 12:51:49 -0800

Mark Birbeck wrote:
>And related to the SML non-debate, I just read that Samsung 
>are bringing
>out a phone that will have MP3 capabilities - with room for 32Mb of
>music. Still worried about parser foot-print?

Still worried I am afraid because it is not just the
size of the parser and applications but how much memory
they need to run.  While I am not expecting the size and
speed differences to exceed 50%, every little bit counts
so it is a matter of benefit/sacrifice ratio.  Note that
I also do not believe this is the primary justification
for SML.

"Simplicity has many rewards, idiocy has many drawbacks.
 -- Don Park

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • XML Memory Requirements (was Re: Feeling good about SML)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • XML/XSL position avaliable
    • From: Pavel Velikhov <pvelikho@c...>

• References:
  • RE: Feeling good about SML
    • From: Mark Birbeck <Mark.Birbeck@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DTD Question - PCDATA followed by an optional element
• Next by Date: Re: Parser compliance
• Previous by thread: RE: Feeling good about SML
• Next by thread: XML/XSL position avaliable
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread