[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Java Parser

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 16:02:13 -0400 (EDT)

David Brownell writes:

 > Did anyone mention size?  Size should be an issue too.  All other
 > things being equal, smaller means fewer lines for bugs to nest in.

Agreed.  It also means faster download time (in an applet), less space
(in a palmtop), etc.  Many existing Java-based parsers could be made
*much* smaller by spinning off non-core functionality into separate
packages layered on top.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Java Parser
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Java Parser
    • From: Sajid Rehman <sajid.rehman@t...>
  • Re: Java Parser
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • Re: Java Parser
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Re: Java Parser
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Java Parser
• Next by Date: Re: Java Parser
• Previous by thread: Re: Java Parser
• Next by thread: Re: Java Parser
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread