[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Java Parser

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 19 Oct 1999 09:33:11 -0400

David Brownell <david-b@p...> writes:

> > Ummmm...I need validation ! So, which one should it be ? TR2 or
> > XML4J ? Performance is an issue here !
> 
> Correctness should be too -- see my XML.com review.

True, but you need to divide the correctness question into two parts:

a) the parser accepts all well-formed/valid documents
b) the parser rejects all malformed/invalid documents

A parser that fails either of these is non-conforming; that said, you
probably care a lot more about (a) than (b) for light-weight clients.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Java Parser
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Java Parser
    • From: Sajid Rehman <sajid.rehman@t...>
  • Re: Java Parser
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: XML ids and XSL keys
• Next by Date: Re: Windows version of RXP
• Previous by thread: Re: Java Parser
• Next by thread: Re: Java Parser
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread