[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: On the record? (was Re: Random thought)

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:15:55 -0700

At 02:02 PM 9/13/99 -0400, Ann Navarro wrote:
>If anyone is seriously expecting a titillating expose  to come out of this
>"hot tip" that's going to "bring down XHTML" and those dastardly "rigid and
>unreasonable" W3C and HTML WG people , I dare say you're going to be deeply
>disappointed (based on current feedback from the reporter involved). 

Yeah, I hear the poor guy went and actually tried to read through
the xml-dev archive, and has since been dragged away whimpering by burly 
men in white coats.  -T.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xml-dev volume (was: On the record?)
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: SOAP 0.9
• Next by Date: Re: xml-dev volume (was: On the record?)
• Previous by thread: Re: On the record? (was Re: Random thought)
• Next by thread: Re: xml-dev volume (was: On the record?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread