[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: an unfilled need

• From: pandeng@t... (Steve Schafer)
• To: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:15:32 GMT

On Fri, 10 Sep 1999 07:58:04 -0700, you wrote:

>Insofar as there is always a way to hack around the limitations of the
>CURRENT model it is essentially impossible to sell the benefits of the
>new model in simple terms. Rather, the listener needs to have wrestled
>with the problem and needs to have developed a dislike for ad hoc
>half-answers. And there are still smart people who I respect that reject
>both OO and the relational model so I wouldn't expect groves to ever be
>uncontroversial. I am still discovering the Zen of OO and the Zen of
>relational myself so how could I brain-dump the Zen of groves (which I
>am also still discovering)? 

A good set of non-trivial, concrete examples would be useful. People
won't be convinced to try the New Thing if they can't see how to apply
it to familiar problems.

-Steve


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: an unfilled need
    • From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>
  • Re: an unfilled need
    • From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@i...>
  • Re: an unfilled need
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: W3C's 'Moral Majesty'
• Next by Date: RE: RFP: Namespace URI for HTML
• Previous by thread: Re: an unfilled need
• Next by thread: Re: an unfilled need
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread