|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] W3C (was Re: an unfilled need)
From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...> >Yes, I've raised this point >repeatedly within the W3C - I don't know what the problem is. I think there is missing stage in procedures at W3C. Some people want standards to allow plurality, others want standards to prevent useless duplication. The "we don't need XSL" kafuffle recently shows this. XML has attracted both peoples because its extensibility allows plurality but it has a fixed delimiter set which attracts the stern antiduplicationists. The antiduplicationist see schemas like this: we will make a universal schema language and then we can get rid of DTDs. But the WWW was built on allowing plurality. So the missing stage in procedures in the W3C is this: for every new XML technology proposed, there should be a mechanism first developed to allow alternatives. The stylesheet PI is an exemplar for this. In the case of schemas, before XML schemas are developed, we should have a mechanism for invoking them, otherwise what else is there but namespaces? I agree with Tim 100% here. Even if just as an interim, the W3C should introduce a schema declaration PI, which binds the document (or an element type) to a schema URL. Rick Jelliffe xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








