[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: an unfilled need

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 11:19:21 -0700

At 01:54 PM 9/6/99 -0400, David Megginson wrote:
>If MS and Netscape/Mozilla both buy into the same Namespace URI, then
>it won't much matter what the W3C says, but I'd still like to hope
>that the XHTML WG will give us a URI -- even just a NOTE with the line
>
>  The XML Namespace URI for HTML is "http://www.w3.org/Markup/".
>
>would help 

Hmm, I observe that the namespace name hardwired to the prefix "xml:" is 

 http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace

(amusing, since the namespace spec is dated January 1999).  Anyhow, I
seem to recall that Dan Connolly cooked this up on behalf of the W3C and
there was a real good reason which I unfortunately forget for having a 
date in there.

So by analogy, a candidate namespace name for HTML would be

 http://www.w3.org/HTML/1999/namespace

And yes, a one-line NOTE on www.w3.org/TR would do the job.  Hey there,
HTML WG, any chance?  If you pick a URI, we all promise not to complain
about what it is.  Right, guys?  -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: an unfilled need
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • Namespace for HTML (Signup Here)
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: an unfilled need
• Next by Date: W3C (was Re: an unfilled need)
• Previous by thread: Re: an unfilled need
• Next by thread: Namespace for HTML (Signup Here)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread