[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces

• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: Marc.McDonald@D..., xml-dev@i..., andrewl@m...
• Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 09:53:25 -0400

At 04:41 PM 9/21/99 -0700, Marc.McDonald@D... wrote:
>> :
>> 
>	Andrew Layman wrote:
>
>> One thing that people would like is to be able to clearly define which
>> documents are valid per the Strict, Transitional and Frameset rules. This
>> is
>> currently done via three DTDs.
>> 
>Fine, though I would argue for a single DTD with conditionals.

The task and constraints given to the group was to bring HTML 4.0 as it
was, into XML. That doesn't provide for significant design variations like
moving to a single DTD with conditionals. 

New and innovative work is continued into future deliverables, working
drafts currently available to the public. 


Ann
---

Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Coming in September --- Mastering XML

Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education             http://www.hwg.org/services/classes





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces
    • From: Marc.McDonald@D...

• Prev by Date: Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
• Next by Date: Re: RFC: Attributes and XML-RPC
• Previous by thread: RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces
• Next by thread: RE: XHTML and the Three Namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread