[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why namespaces?

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: "Oren Ben-Kiki" <oren@c...>, "XML-Dev Mailing list" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 13:16:09 -0700

At 09:46 PM 8/31/99 +0200, Oren Ben-Kiki wrote:
>1. Unique naming - making sure that one can call "areElementsTheSame(name1,
>name2)".
>2. Grammar/Syntax/Structure constraints - "isDocumentValid(rootElement,
>DTD)", "addDefaultsToDocument(rootElement, DTD)".
>3. Semantics - doing whatever the application is for.
>
>I would like to think that the intention was for namespaces to live
>exclusively in level 1 (call it "lex"), DTDs/Schemas in level 2 (call it
>"yacc"), and level 3 is the application itself. 

Hey, very good.  I think this is an extremely accurate and deep statement
of how things ought to be. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Next by Date: Re: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
• Previous by thread: ANNOUNCE: new version of search engine for XML documents
• Next by thread: XML Parsers for Java -- Recommendations?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread