[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: why distinctions within XHTML?

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: "'XML-Dev Mailing list'" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 13:10:56 -0700

Two comments for us:

1. We are diverging into W3C-as-evil-empire topic here.  Lets focus and
remain on topic.

2. The scene looks like a gang of rowdy engineers ganging up on one woman.
Lets get our civility under control.

and one comment for Ann:

1. Could you comment on where rest of the XHTML WG/IG feels about this issue
and how flexible they are on the position they have taken with the latest
draft?  In other words, is this issue important enough to the XHTML WG to
risk throwing the baby out with the bath water?

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>
  • RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>

• References:
  • RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
    • From: "Erik James Freed" <ejfreed@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why namespaces?
• Next by Date: Re: Why namespaces?
• Previous by thread: RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Next by thread: RE: why distinctions within XHTML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread