Re: W3C (was Re: XSL Debate, Leventhal responds to Stephen Deach)
From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...> > > Yes, I would like to be able to bring in more people and yes, I know > that there are problems for very small companies, individual > consultants, and so on. Currently I don't see a viable alternative > economic setup, though. > I'm not interested in joining a working group, but I would like to follow the design discussions of the working groups. For example Netscape is doing this via their public newsgroups. Right now I am working on an XML based query language. I'm doing this work in the dark because the last feedback out of the W3C was this page from Nov 15. http://www.w3.org/TandS/QL/QL98/ Why can't we have read-only access to the discussion group archive at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ql/? This would allow me to keep my code somewhat in alignment with the thoughts of the W3C. Without this access my code is likely to be completely different that the first W3C draft. And when the draft arrives I may choose to ignore it because it will be too much work to bring my code into alignment. Is this really what the W3C is trying to achieve? Jon Smirl jonsmirl@m... xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format