[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: "XML List" <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 09:21:19 -0400 (EDT)

WorldNet writes:

 > If someone could explain, I don't understand yet why a reference to
 > such a 'namespace' would be useful, particularly if there is
 > nothing there to access other than the seemingly ephemeral
 > reference itself.

You can uniquely identify names across document types; for example, a
search engine could recognize an HTML <cite> element in many different 
document types, and a rendering engine could have a library of
handlers for well-known element types.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>
  • RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: "WorldNet" <csgallagher@w...>

• Prev by Date: Top-down or bottom-up?
• Next by Date: RE: XSL Debate, Leventhal responds to Stephen Deach
• Previous by thread: RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Next by thread: Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread