[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)

• From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@j...>
• To: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w...>, "Paul Prescod" <paul@p...>
• Date: Sun, 6 Jun 1999 11:17:16 +0800

> > It strikes me as clearly poor design to use an HTTP url for something
not
> > retrievable by the HTTP protocol.
>
> It would be, but no such examples were given.

Here are two:

In http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/ there is the example of using
http://www.w3.org/staffId/85740 to refer to a person.
In http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-xslt-19990421,
http://www.w3.org/XSL/Transform/1.0 is used as the namespace.

Admittedly, I have less of a problem with a latter case. I would imagine
that soon there will be some document placed at that URI (whether a machine
readable schema or not) describing the namespace.

I have a bigger problem with the former, as I have outlined previously on
this list. To raise again the sample problem I raised before: what would it
mean to use RDF to specifier the Creator of http://www.w3.org/staffId/85740?
Does it mean The Creator :-) or the creator of the retrievable resource (if
any) at that URI?

James


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
    • From: Chris Lilley <chris@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSL Challenge
• Next by Date: RE: schema output for critique
• Previous by thread: RE: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Next by thread: Re: Overloaded URIs (was Re: XLink: behavior must go!)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread