[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Argh...Entities

• From: MURATA Makoto <murata@a...>
• To: www-xml-schema-comments@w..., xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 19:19:22 +0900

Paul Prescod wrote:
> 
> I understand your goal but I think that that is too severe a constraint.

I have been the only opponent.  I am likely to lose.  (; ;)

> The convenience of annotating the tree from the schema is just too large.

I agree with this observation, but my point is that information set 
contribution is ouside the scope of the schema validator.  It should be left 
to application programs.  By doing so, we can make the specification a lot 
simpler.

Now that schemata are in the XML syntax, they can be parsed by XML processors.  
Thus, application programs can easily obtain additional information from 
schemata.  We only have to allow XML schemata to have user-defined elements, 
which may be used by such application programs.

Cheers,

Makoto
 
Fuji Xerox Information Systems
 
Tel: +81-44-812-7230   Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata@a...

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Argh...Entities
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• References:
  • Re: Argh...Entities
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Argh...Entities
• Next by Date: Re: [Question] Re: XLink: behavior must go!
• Previous by thread: Re: Argh...Entities
• Next by thread: Re: Argh...Entities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread