Paul Prescod wrote: > > I understand your goal but I think that that is too severe a constraint. I have been the only opponent. I am likely to lose. (; ;) > The convenience of annotating the tree from the schema is just too large. I agree with this observation, but my point is that information set contribution is ouside the scope of the schema validator. It should be left to application programs. By doing so, we can make the specification a lot simpler. Now that schemata are in the XML syntax, they can be parsed by XML processors. Thus, application programs can easily obtain additional information from schemata. We only have to allow XML schemata to have user-defined elements, which may be used by such application programs. Cheers, Makoto Fuji Xerox Information Systems Tel: +81-44-812-7230 Fax: +81-44-812-7231 E-mail: murata@a... xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format