[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Argh...Entities

• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 08:54:10 -0500

MURATA Makoto wrote:
> 
> Now that schemata are in the XML syntax, they can be parsed by XML processors.
> Thus, application programs can easily obtain additional information from
> schemata.  We only have to allow XML schemata to have user-defined elements,
> which may be used by such application programs.

If a schema parses some date text to validate it then having the
application do it again is inefficient and inconvenient. A schema could
also use content model information to report breaks between content model
chunks (if it "reported" non-terminals). This is incredibly convenient for
application designers.
-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

The dress code in Las Cruces New Mexico has been tightened [to] target 
Gothic clothing, such as dark trench coats. "It is not a witch hunt"
Superintendent Jesse L. Gozales said. "It is for the safety of the kids
in our schools."  - Associated Press, May 16 1999

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Argh...Entities
    • From: MURATA Makoto <murata@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Problems validating the W3C schema DTD's
• Next by Date: SGML lawyer questions
• Previous by thread: Re: Argh...Entities
• Next by thread: Re: Argh...Entities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread