Re: Again wit da AND and Repetitions
John Cowan wrote: > > Mark McDonald wrote: > > > > <!ELEMENT x (a? | b?)> > > > <!ELEMENT a (c,d,e,f,g)> > > > <!ELEMENT b (c,d,e,f,h)> > > > > > > With an input of elements c, d, e, f, h in element x. > > And David Brownell replied: > > > Actually, the content model for "x" is in error there, so any > > XML processor is allowed to report an error however rudely it > > chooses to do so. That content model is "ambigious". > > I can only assume that both of you are suffering from brain farts. > Any "x" that contains anything but an "a" or a "b" is obviously > invalid. You are talking as if the above declarations were: > > <!ENTITY % a "(c,d,e,f,g)"> > <!ENTITY % b "(c,d,e,f,h)"> > <!ELEMENT x (%a;? | %b;?)> > > Element declarations refer to lexically apparent objects (elements), > not to mere groups of elements defined by pseudo-BNF. Ah, yes ... I was reacting to the intent, not the exact wording! Thanks for catching that. There've been misstatements on this topic. The XML spec is clear that ambiguous content models are errors. What it does poorly is say exactly what that means; it basically boils down to a reality that documents better not have it, "or else". And any parser is free to do _whatever it wants_ when faced with such errors. - dave xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; (un)subscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format