[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Again wit da AND and Repetitions

• From: roddey@u...
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 18:11:08 -0600

>>Does anyone believe that these can be done in less than brute force tree
search
>>times?
>
>XML requires deterministic content models. This allows validators to do
>their job without having to look more than one element ahead or do brute
>force tree searches.
>

Actually it does not require deterministic models, it just allows you to check
for them. And, I guess its not really what XML does or does not do that's in
question here, its what the new upcoming schema spec proposes to do that's at
issue.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Prev by Date: Re: Again wit da AND and Repetitions
• Next by Date: Re: Fw: XLink: behavior must go!
• Previous by thread: Re: Again wit da AND and Repetitions
• Next by thread: Re: Again wit da AND and Repetitions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread