[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Argh...Entities

• From: Ronald Bourret <rbourret@i...>
• To: "www-xml-schema-comments@w..." <www-xml-schema-comments@w...>, xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 10:55:02 +0200

Simon St. Laurent:

> I agree with Paul 100% on this one.  For precisely this reason, DDML
> remained entity free for a very long time (though I got outvoted on
> unparsed entities in the end.)

As one of those who helped outvote Simon, I'd just like to say that I have 
completely recanted.  Including unparsed entity definitions in DDML was a 
mistake and I now regret it.

-- Ron Bourret


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Argh...Entities
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: PI target names
• Next by Date: query info from database to xml
• Previous by thread: Re: Argh...Entities
• Next by thread: Re: Argh...Entities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread