[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Argh...Entities

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 13:18:21 -0400 (EDT)

John Cowan writes:

 > Simon, this isn't just meant for you, but for Paul and everybody.
 > I hope you are protesting to www-xml-schema-comments@w....
 > I know that looks like a black hole, but it's the *only* chance
 > of getting this bogosity stopped, due to a Procedural Blunder
 > in the creation of the WD.

Panic might be premature.  Schemas are the bound to be the most
controversial part of the new XML activity, and we should be grateful
that the WG had the courage to put out a public snapshot of their
current (and still incomplete) work rather than maintaining the W3C
shroud of secrecy that has drawn so much criticism.

My recommendation is to send brief, formal comments to
www-xml-schema-comments@w... and more general discussion to
XML-Dev.  We can leave the horse heads out of the beds until we see
what happens in the next WD.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Argh...Entities
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Argh...Entities
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Redirecting XML files?
• Next by Date: Re: Benchmark of 6 XML parsers on Solaris
• Previous by thread: Re: Argh...Entities
• Next by thread: RE: Argh...Entities
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread